Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Latest Forum Topics
July 13, 2020, 09:28:51 PM

July 05, 2020, 01:02:50 AM

May 05, 2020, 11:17:39 PM

April 11, 2020, 10:47:56 PM

March 11, 2020, 08:15:25 PM

March 08, 2020, 03:03:59 PM

March 05, 2020, 04:12:24 PM

March 04, 2020, 04:26:22 PM
Dragon Boat Canada
Dragon Boat Canada

IDBF
IDBF

Canoe Kayak Canada
Canoe Kayak Canada
188 Guests, 0 Users
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: ADBF Rant  (Read 29008 times)
paddleboy
Water Bottle
***
Offline Offline

Team: FCRCC
Posts: 540



« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2005, 12:53:41 PM »

The gemini's were a mistake !!!! I have yet to see this boat used in competiton anywhere else other than in europe and for that matter Poland . The worlds in China that were just held did not use this style boat and I believe they won't be used in Germany either .The club crews won't be useing this style boat so of what use is this boat for those that compete internationally ?? Look at the False Creek Women ..........what are they training in for the worlds?? thats right , a 6-16 not the gemini .

 So far all I have seen come from this boat is injuries to some paddlers who are forced to train in them . I would much rather of seen the money spent on the 6-16's to bring them back into shape . As you have seen they are selling the Gemini's over in Victoria and for good reason.They can't even sell those boats and lord knows they have tried . I hate to think that we limited the competition from around N.America because we switched to useing this style boat . I know if I was on a team from back east ,and knew this was the boat we had to race in ,I would not waste my teams money (around $2000 + airfare ) to come to the Alcan .

 To improve the gemini's would be a huge undertaking and the cost would make it not worth it .The elimination of the useless 11 th seat is the #1 problem . This should have been a 10 row boat not 11 . So how do you eliminate the 11th row?? It looks like you would have to re-mould the boat .Yes, you can modify the underside of the seat to allow for a little more leg room but really thats hardly the problem . What ever you do to these boats will not improve them a whole lot . I just wish that maybe some imput from the racers was used before purchasing these boats.I can tell you it would have taken me less than 5 minutes in this boat to say not to purchase this design . The BUK,SRS,and others are a far better boat to race in and make it much more enjoyable to be a paddler ,the gemini definately makes you have second thoughts .

 This is my 2 cents and like it matters......... Rolling Eyes
Logged

DISCLAIMER: anything written by this user is clearly his own point of view and may not be the same as those of the team / teams  he races for !!  : )
 
 2006 CCWC , 2007 D/B World's (AUSTRALIA)2009 D/B World's (PRAGUE) ,2011 D/B World's (Florida)
adbf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2005, 12:56:19 PM »

Quote from: Imposter
So, Mr. ADBF claims that the only reason FCRCC/ADBF bought the gemini crap boats was that they were cheap.  Very insightful.  Doesn't matter that they were seriously defective, had 11 useless rows & would likely thouroughly p***-off most of their db members/stakeholders.  Where was the consultation with the membership prior to this purchase (which was using paddlers money)???

Mr. ADBF / FCRCC's due diligence was to have an elite paddler who rarely (never?) actually practices in a dragon boat to go take a quick look at a gemini while he was participating at the world championships in Poland...even though that race was not using this type of 11 row gemini, and this paddler was hardly representative of the typical db paddler.

Mr. ADBF claims that he got quotes from 6-16 rip-off Foundation 2000 (to the thrill I'm sure of our own local dboat builder...), BuK (the mercedes of dboats in price & quality) & gemini (obviously the kia of dboats).  No SRS? No Plastek?  There were other compromise choices available out there...

Yes, dragon boats do have a life span and now we are stuck with a defective, worthless piece of crap boat for the next 10+ yrs...  Was any consideration given to go back to the various clubs for more money to get a boat that would actually accomodate paddlers???  Was any thought given to wait another year using 6-16s so that the timing of the new boat delivery was not an issue???  Was any thought given to send actual dragonboaters to go look at the product, vs some guy who does surf ski / OC1, kayak ... pretty much anything but dragonboat???  

Imagine how great it would be if the correct decision had been made.  It made me sad when I was in Montreal last fall and saw over 20 1-2 yr old BuKs and SRS boats all lined up at the docks, while in Vancouver we have waterlogged 6-16s & defective geminis.  What's wrong with this picture?  As someone else asked, where has all the paddler's money gone over the past several years???  

Truly one of the worst decisions ever made...


Funny how you critize one of the founders of 6/16 for looking at the Gemini in Poland.  If I was to trust someone I would trust an Olympic paddler (who helped develop and found your favourite company/boat the 6/16) to an "Imposter".  The Geminis were used in Poland from I have heard.  Similar to what happened in Vancouver, every other race was a Gemini (or something wasn't there just what I was told).

SRS and Plastex were not out there.  If you have been looking at the other DB forum, there has been quite a controvesy with Plastex and their marketing (actually not Plastex but the people bringing it over).  SRS had lots of complaints at their first festival.  I guess the race committee should have  also looked at the Destiny boat out of Calgary also, how about the D2 also.

So I guess your name lives up to what you are an uninfomred imposter  Laughing
Logged
paddleboy
Water Bottle
***
Offline Offline

Team: FCRCC
Posts: 540



« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2005, 01:15:45 PM »

I raced in Montreal last yr in the SRS boat and yes there were a very few minor issues but nothing like the issues you have w/ the Gemini's.At least they could fix the SRS not like the issues you now have to deal with the Gemini .The SRS is a far better boat when compared to the Gemini and it;s made in Canada . Before you go off about what you read on the other forum about the srs maybe you should have tried it . It seems that a comment like that is probably why we ended up w/ the gemini (you spent to much time surfing & listening to what another person had to say, when you should have been paddling  in them Wink ). They should have raced in it at least once before making a decision to buy it .

 
 When I was in physio last yr (for a gemini related injury) the therapist at this office could not believe the amount of new patients they were getting w/ arm and shoulder injuries as a result of the new boats .I was 1 of 4 paddlers who had come in that week and they asked me about the new boats ,all they said was it made it good for their business . So now add on top of the cost of the gemini's the cost of medical treatments some of us have had to undergo as a result

 You know I sit here and think ...............Have you even had 1 paddler come to you and say ............" Man,those gemini's are the best thing ever
to come to the creek " ............I bet you have not had 1 positive comment about this choice of boat and now were going into our second yr w/ them and the bashing is still going on over this choice. Whats wrong w/ this picture  Rolling Eyes
Logged

DISCLAIMER: anything written by this user is clearly his own point of view and may not be the same as those of the team / teams  he races for !!  : )
 
 2006 CCWC , 2007 D/B World's (AUSTRALIA)2009 D/B World's (PRAGUE) ,2011 D/B World's (Florida)
Guido
Wannabe Paddler
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 225


« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2005, 02:34:00 PM »

Excuse me.....is there a moderator around?

I thought this spread was for ADBF RANTING.....not GEMINI BOAT ranting....

This is so funny.....please write some more......this is killing me with laughter.

The grammar,  the spelling mistakes......wow.....I'm wondering if any of you got through elementary school at all!!!!!
Logged
adbf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2005, 02:40:36 PM »

So who said I loved the Gemini's, not me.  I have raced in better boats and I haved raced in worse.  If I am a rec paddler or a team with 22 or more paddlers then the 6/16 is nice, for a competitive paddler my 1st choice would be the North American version of a BuK.

I am not on the race committee I just know a bunch of them.  My point is that I am just explaining the process they went through.  I take execption to uninformed people saying that people were sitting around and decided on a boat.  As you say, get the facts right then you can comment.  Most of the comments here are just totally untrue so trying to set the record straight.

So you injured yourself and it is all because of the Gemini.  Hmmm, it would have nothing to do with your paddling ability or technique would it.  Ask Rob if it is your stroke or not  Wink
Logged
paddleboy
Water Bottle
***
Offline Offline

Team: FCRCC
Posts: 540



« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2005, 03:23:47 PM »

side note : the comments made by me are those of my own views not my teams  Wink .....................LOL

  back to the Alcan rant no more gemini bashing from me ..... I luv the Gemini's  Wink
Logged

DISCLAIMER: anything written by this user is clearly his own point of view and may not be the same as those of the team / teams  he races for !!  : )
 
 2006 CCWC , 2007 D/B World's (AUSTRALIA)2009 D/B World's (PRAGUE) ,2011 D/B World's (Florida)
adbf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2005, 03:46:40 PM »

I agree the fees are too much for what we get.  I don't know where the money goes.  Start line is suspect, I don't trust the fairness of the starts.  Not sure why held starts can't be done, I guess with all the boat traffic it makes it difficult.

Now my mother always said to have something nice to say so:

The seeding was okay, the racing was okay, it was nice to have repechage back.  The semis were tough, some heats were stronger than others but it looks like that was because some teams screwed up a race before that so the strong teams ended up together.  Only one team from each semi going forward to a particular final makes it difficult but exciting, sudden death.

I did like the drawing of the lanes last year for the championships.  It meant the tide was someone's friend and someone's enemy.
Logged
Imposter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 48


« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2005, 04:55:16 PM »

Well, ADBF, you obviously share a similar disposition to the gang (ADBF Race Director, his cohorts on the FCRCC exec. and apparently a former Olympian) that made the gemini decision - you have absolutely no interest in hearing from the “uninformed” db community, the people who provided the money used to purchase the boats and for whom the boats were purchased.

So ADBF, please “inform” us...we are all ears.  Have I mislead as to the people who were responsible for this horrendous decision?  Why was there such a rush to get these defective boats to Vancouver for last yrs race, instead of waiting and making a better decision when there would be more DB choices available?  Is it your qualified opinion that the gemini is superior to the SRS & Plastex?

Tell us - was this former Olympian adequately qualified to perform due diligence (which I assume he did between his races) on such a major purchase?  He knew the detailed specs of the boat, vs. 10 row buks, etc and felt qualified to determine the ergonomics - that the 11 row crap gemini could adequately provide enough space to accommodate paddlers - or did the gang at FCRCC once again go cheap on due diligence and ultimately get far less than they paid for?  


Quote
I did like the drawing of the lanes last year for the championships. It meant the tide was someone's friend and someone's enemy.


Once again I disagree - the best teams earn the right to get the preferred middle lanes.  Do they have a draw to determine lanes for the 100 meter finals (or canoe/kayak for that matter) at the Olympics?  Put the best teams in the middle lanes, so that none of the best teams are disadvantaged vs. their direct competition.
Logged
adbf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2005, 05:38:15 PM »

So tell us, one who jumps from one team to another with 10 days before Alcan  Wink , what would be the best way.  You say middle lanes, I think the people at Alcan can do that but then everyone would need to accept that they may not be in the "best" lanes from time to time.  

So you want the best teams in the best lanes.  I would agree in a perfect world but we do not live in a perfect world.  The "best" lanes change depending on the tides, wind, and other factors, as we all saw in 2003 and 2004.

So are you suggesting the "best" lanes are changed depending on these factors.  If that is the case then Alcan will need to evaluate between each race what is "best" and adjust accordingly.  Just imagine the chaos (not the moderator of the forum) that would entail.  

I guess that would be basis for another thread so we can all rant about "how bad our lane was even though we were the best going in to the final".   I can think of some teams who would monopolize the thread though.  Nothing is perfect but it looks like Alcan left it up to the teams to pick their lane.  Of course they could ask the teams which lane they would like and if they are the best then they can have the lane requested maybe you should suggest that to the race committee on one of those days where they are sitting around deciding how else to screw the paddlers  Laughing (I know they don't but some of you think they do).
Logged
Secret Weapon
Life Jacket
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 143


« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2005, 06:27:30 PM »

Wow, this discussion alone was well worth joining this site!  Thanks for the spice Imposter and ADBF.  I think we can all agree the gemini's were and are a mistake but unfortunately are here to stay  Sad  .  The boats should have been tested by a dragon boat team and not a few selected flat water paddlers.  But alas we all learn from mistakes and move on, so shall we...
Logged
Secret Weapon
Life Jacket
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 143


« Reply #25 on: February 11, 2005, 06:28:52 PM »

I made a faux pas and spelled my own name wrong  Embarassed , anyone know how to change it?
Logged
zephyrantes
Boat Barnacles
****
Offline Offline

Team: SIEG ZEON!
Posts: 1181



« Reply #26 on: February 11, 2005, 06:54:43 PM »

Quote from: adbf
The seeding was okay, the racing was okay, it was nice to have repechage back.  The semis were tough, some heats were stronger than others but it looks like that was because some teams screwed up a race before that so the strong teams ended up together.  Only one team from each semi going forward to a particular final makes it difficult but exciting, sudden death.



Tell that to a "COMP A" trained team that ends up paddling against teams that are suited to be in "COMP C".   How much "fun" is it to for rec teams to end up facing a team that would definately beat them in a medal race?   How much "fun" AND "difficult" is it for that COMP A team to race against teams that are mainly recreational?   Please... explain it to me, because I'm cannot seem to fathom where you're coming from.

"sudden death"?!    I don't think so.   It might make getting into a particular final division a lot more rewarding, but are you (and/or the committee) so short sighted throughout the decision making processes?
Logged
meowzers
Life Jacket
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #27 on: February 11, 2005, 11:38:19 PM »

my 2nd beef: adult division is a BIT "odd"

how did one determine placing.. if by time... then you have one BIG factor... the boats...

i had someone try to explain to me how the rankings were done... first i was confused then i was puzzled now i'm exteremly confuzzled

HOW? and why not go back to original format w/e it was. last yrs seeding was JUST a TAD bit UNfair 0_o;
Logged
Angus
Life Jacket
**
Offline Offline

Team: Paddle Slut
Posts: 113


« Reply #28 on: February 12, 2005, 08:57:08 AM »

I find it incredibly ironic that whenever people complain about a festival, some smarty pants always comes along and says: "Why don't you volunteer or help organize" or something. Well guess what fo'? Unless you're a former Olympian or someone who's been paddling since Expo 86, you're out of luck! Why? You got no real experience, and therefore, are only suitable as a moronic foot soldier picking up garbage on the day of the event or doing grunt work for da man! 8)

Ever try to tell someone with more paddling experiece than you that they're technique is wrong?  Laughing (Yes, I'm guilty of this on both the giving and receiving ends). We paddlers have a nasty habit of developing an ego after a few years and it becomes hard to take advice from people with less experience.

The best ways to influence this sort of organization:
- (if you're rich) give them wads of money and tie some conditions
- (if you're influential) volunteer to help organize
For the rest of us:
- complain like heck and make them look bad (what this thread is about)
- boycott them

Of course, there's no way we can vote for the directors each year... naw....

So umm.. adbf: can you ask your friends where the money goes? After all, this festival has one of the lowest medal to team ratios, but one of the highest entry fees in North America! Yet... it's consistently sponsored by quite a few corporations. B.S.
Logged
tiger
Wannabe Paddler
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 189



« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2005, 04:32:24 PM »

I guess I'll wade into this, it has been fun reading it all.

I agree I wonder where the money goes but we should ask the festival organizers.  Remember the races are just part of a bigger festival, I suspect the money the races bring in goes to fund the other part of the festival.  So everytime we see those really bad acts up on stage, clap because you helped bring them on stage Smile.

Now as for the seeding, I don't think it was the seeding that was wrong.  I looked at the first set of races and all of the "top" teams were basically apart (for the 1st race).  That is what it should be (if you want to see bad seeding remember Victoria last year, now that is bad seeding).  The way the teams raced (yes primarily in the Geminis) really altered where the teams ended up.  Some teams had a bigger adjustment to the Geminis than others, okay maybe they never adjusted but that was what made the placing more different than usual.

Now based on what I have heard, the same group did the seedings for Kelowna so if we did not like the seedings in Vancouver then Kelowna should have had the same problems.  Anybody not like the seedings in Kelowna.  I think they were fair, at least for the team I was on.  No Geminis just biased lane(s)  Shocked

That is my 2 cents worth
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to: